Of course it's fair. The more you have invested into a business - the more 'power' you should have when voting.
Denis Gromb has written: 'Is one share/one vote optimal?'
When only one person is nominated, a vote is unnecessary.
One reason city-states shifted to democracy was because the people wanted a say in the government. They wanted to be able to vote on laws.
You could do; Shake it Trade it. (For when companies shake hands to agree to fair trade a product they shake hands, and then trade) Or if this one isnt right try typing in google this is just one of mine i had to use for my homework
One can purchase some BT shares from the following sources: One Share, Fair Investments, Share Prices, Ethex, Money Sense, Keep and Share, to name a few.
The Board of Directors of a corporation are elected by the shareholders with one vote per share.
a fair test is were you only change one thing
That's not going to happen.
It means you can vote before the Election Day and to vote when there is an election. Only one out of 3 people who can vote don’t vote. When people don’t vote they leave the decisions to others.
no of course not
you can only change one thing.
Their is not a best one, they all have the same talent and they all play a fair share in the songs they sing :)