Of course it's fair. The more you have invested into a business - the more 'power' you should have when voting.
Denis Gromb has written: 'Is one share/one vote optimal?'
One reason city-states shifted to democracy was because the people wanted a say in the government. They wanted to be able to vote on laws.
When only one person is nominated, a vote is unnecessary.
You could do; Shake it Trade it. (For when companies shake hands to agree to fair trade a product they shake hands, and then trade) Or if this one isnt right try typing in google this is just one of mine i had to use for my homework
One can purchase some BT shares from the following sources: One Share, Fair Investments, Share Prices, Ethex, Money Sense, Keep and Share, to name a few.
The Board of Directors of a corporation are elected by the shareholders with one vote per share.
That's not going to happen.
a fair test is were you only change one thing
It means you can vote before the Election Day and to vote when there is an election. Only one out of 3 people who can vote don’t vote. When people don’t vote they leave the decisions to others.
no of course not
you can only change one thing.
Their is not a best one, they all have the same talent and they all play a fair share in the songs they sing :)