The philosophy of science is
concerned with the assumptions,
foundations, methods and implications of science.
It is also concerned with the use and merit of science and
sometimes overlaps metaphysics and epistemology by exploring
whether scientific results are actually a study of truth.
In addition to these central problems of science as a whole,
many philosophers of science also consider problems that apply
to particular sciences (e.g. philosophy of Biology or philosophy of physics).
Some philosophers of science also use contemporary results in science to reach conclusions about philosophy.
Philosophy of science has historically been met with mixed response
from the scientific community. Though scientists often contribute to the field,
many prominent scientists have felt that the practical effect on their work is limited;
a popular quote attributed to physicist Richard Feynman goes,
"Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds."
In response, some philosophers (e.g. Jonathan Schaffer) have
pointed out that it is likely that ornithological knowledge
would be of great benefit to birds, were it possible for them to possess it. :D xx
Philosophy is considered the "science of all sciences" because it provides a foundation for reasoning, logic, and critical thinking that underpins other scientific disciplines. Philosophical inquiries into concepts like truth, ethics, and meaning help shape the methodologies and assumptions that guide scientific research and inquiry. In this sense, philosophy serves as a foundational framework for all other sciences.
Yes, philosophy is an abstract science.
Science can legitimately be considered to have been a historical outgrowth of what used to be called natural philosophy.
The difference between science and philosophy is that the science studies reality in a methodical way, while that the philosophy ponders her through reasoning and logic. On the one hand, science wants to explain what that surrounds us, and does so through your knowledge.
Because it can not be a science.
Most scientists and most philosophers would not consider philosophy to be a science. However, both science and philosophy are characterized by very careful thought and analysis and scholarship. Both are engaged in an effort to understand the universe in which we live. However, scientists emphasize observation, while philosophers emphasize abstract thought. There is certainly some overlap between these subjects, and there is even such a subject as the philosophy of science. There is not, however, a science of philosophy.
Philosophy is no longer a field of Science at all. Science, specifically Physics, did develop from Philosophy, and other Sciences developed from Physics. This (above) explains the term "PhD" (Doctor of Philosophy) and "Physician". There are many differences between Philosophy and Science. The most important is probably that Science deals exclusively with physical objects (living or not), while Philosophy has a wider area of concern. Also, in Science, questions can (often) be answered by performing an experiment. If everyone agrees that the experiment was designed and done well, the results are accepted as "the correct answer." It is not like that in Philosophy.
James H. Fetzer has written: 'Philosophy and Cognitive Science' 'Philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy 'Computers and cognition' -- subject(s): Cognitive science 'Glossary of epistemology/philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Dictionaries, Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Science, Theory of Knowledge 'Artificial intelligence' -- subject(s): Artificial intelligence 'Philosophy and cognitive science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and cognitive science
because it is a common word
Philosophy is a science by it self.Human society is a laboratory for its experiments.
Because all of science's theories are based on assumptions. Just study up on the Philosophy Of Science.
Unlike science, philosophy is not based on observable truths or known facts.
Political science IS a philosophy. It is the study of how people form politics and policies.
Herbert Dingle has written: 'A century of science, 1851-1951' -- subject(s): Science, History 'Through science to philosophy' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy 'Modern astrophysics ..' -- subject(s): Astrophysics, Stars 'Alfred Fowler, 1868-1940' 'Modern spectroscopy' -- subject(s): Spectrum analysis 'The sources of Eddington's philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Physics 'The scientific adventure' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, History 'Relativity for all' -- subject(s): Relativity (Physics)
Yes, philosophy is an abstract science.
Morality is a branch of philosophy, not science.
"Is semantics a Philosophy or a science" is a question of concern. In order to answer it we , firstly, need to know about philosophy and science. Philosophy, in simple words, is knowledge. It is a rational investigation of truths and principles of being, knowledge or conduct. Science, on the other hand, is the emperical evidence of knowledge. These evidence, are based on experience or observation. Though observation or experience or experiment the knowledge we get is called science. When we know know what philosophy and science are, we can nominate semantics both. Semantic is philosophy and science as well. We know that semantics is the study of meaning. It is meaning of the words and sentences as well. When we say that semantic is a philosophy, it means we know the
Luciano Floridi has written: 'Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy' 'The need for gnoseology' 'The philosophy of information' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Information science 'Philosophy and Computing' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Computer science