Because there are many people of mixed races everywhere. Looks are deceiving sometimes so accusing a person with a hispanic's skin tone has its faults.
In some cases yes, it does.
Racial profiling is wrong because insead of getting to know someone, you are focusing on their color. Doing that you cannot get to know a person for who they really are. Everyone is different, some people are good, some people are bad. People shouldn't be judged wheater theyre good or bad because of their color
The largest disadvantage of racial profiling is the increased number of innocent people being stopped or targeted by law enforcement for no other reason than their race. This can result in injury and death of innocent citizens, especially when the innocent victim becomes irate over being targeted when they have done nothing wrong and law enforcement (or some other armed vigilante) overreacts. The Trayvon Martin tragedy is a good example. This can create tensions between minorities and officials, which can lead to further misunderstandings.It encourages officials to treat all people of one kind as criminals in a "better safe than sorry" attitude.Racial profiling can also be used as an excuse for casual or overt racism.Worsened race relations causes minorities to be less likely to try to become officials, thus leading to a statistically homogeneous number of officials due to fewer applicants.Racial profiling can lead people to feel victimized, sometimes requiring mental counseling for their encounters.Racial profiling is bad for business in several ways. It discourages businesses from starting up in areas with a large number of minorities. It discourages banks from giving loans to qualified borrowers due to race.An innocent person may be charged by an officer and convicted in court.It sends the message that our police and in effect our courts are corrupt.Racial profiling leads to the wrong conclusions. Not all people of a similar race act the same no matter what the race is.It allows the already disadvantaged to be more at a disadvantage. They do not enjoy the same constitutional rights as those who are never "racially profiled".
It depends on where you are asking about. Most of the time, the police are known for keeping the streets safe from criminals: they stop or prevent crimes; they investigate and try to solve them; and they arrest potential suspects. In many cities, the public has great respect for law enforcement and the police have made an effort to have a good relationship with the community. But there are also some controversies which involve the police: in some cities, the police have been accused of racial profiling, or of being excessively violent in arresting or even questioning suspects. If you give us more specifics about what you want to know, we can provide a more complete answer.
Trying to guess whether a person is or is not guilty is a fifty/fifty proposition.Obviously one wishes to know the guilty, and does not wish to wrongfully detain the not guilty.Looked at that way, it would only have to increase the chances of guessing right by one percent to make it worthwhile.Or so it is argued.Forgot is that no sooner is it used, than those about illegal matters adjust, and simply send someone (with bomb or drugs or whatnot) who does not fit the profile. Now the one percent increase in doing good has become a many percent point decreased chance of doing good.The only way to keep the percent chance of catching guilty people consistent, is to avoid all racial profiling. The criminal syndicates and terrorist groups will not then know what type to send or not send, and the police - deprived of an "easy out" - will develop more sophisticated and non-race based methods to determine probable guilt.(Non-racial profiling can make sense. In a liquor store, Old Lady Simmons in the wheelchair stopping in for her monthly bottle of merlot is not as likely to shoplift as a group of tough looking guys with dirty clothes and gang tattoos. Regardless as to who is what color.)
of course, its a good way of defining the requirements of a system whilst also profiling the user
They are good for goodies and bad for badies. police officers are good people
Rosa Parks was considered a good leader because of her courage and determination to stand up against racial segregation by refusing to give up her seat on a bus in Montgomery, Alabama in 1955. Her actions sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal moment in the Civil Rights Movement, and inspired others to fight for equality and justice. Parks' leadership and commitment to nonviolent protest made her a symbol of resistance and a catalyst for change in the fight against racial discrimination.
It is true that racial discrimination still exists in our world, however, a person who is genuinely good at his or her work, is not unemployable, regardless of what racial group he or she may belong to.
It is true that racial discrimination still exists in our world, however, a person who is genuinely good at his or her work, is not unemployable, regardless of what racial group he or she may belong to.
Good metal police for car shining will be that which gives your car that glossy look.
Police academy schools is a good academy to go to in order to become a police in your area. They train daily to become good and well at working in this coarse.