Want this question answered?
"MN" is not a chemical symbol, but "Mn" in a chemical equation signifies the involvement of at least one manganese atom in the reaction for which the equation is valid.
Quantum Mechanics is valid for nearly everything (So far) it's just that the effects of it are only seen in microscopic scales like individual particles.
I have an hypothesis that light waves are made up of particles. This is a valid scientific inquiry yet it cannot be proved false, because under certain circumstances, light waves behave like particles.
the inner part of leaf is called transeverse section
Kinematics does not require constant acceleration. There are different equations for different situations. So some of the equations will be valid even when the acceleration is not constant.
This is valid for some particles as photons and neutrinos.
There is no variable, and the equation is not valid.
"MN" is not a chemical symbol, but "Mn" in a chemical equation signifies the involvement of at least one manganese atom in the reaction for which the equation is valid.
That means that multiplying both sides of the equation by the same non-zero number is a valid operation, which often helps you simplify the equation.
Substitute the coordinates of the point into the equation of the line. If the equation is still valid then the point is on the line; if not then it is not.
Not sure, but it's a valid solution of Einstein's Field Equation.
0.5
Quantum Mechanics is valid for nearly everything (So far) it's just that the effects of it are only seen in microscopic scales like individual particles.
If that's supposed to be a straight line equation then it's not valid because the equality sign is missing.
-8
Plug the x-values into the original equation. If you get the same y-values, then the points are valid.
The equation is:PV = k, where:P - pressureV- volumek - constantThis law is valid at constant temperature.