0
Why is the adversary system of law a nessesity to produce just results?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Ah well that is not really answerable. The American adversarial system is simply two advocates (lawyers) who argue either side of the case before an impartial referee (judge) and an impartial finder of fact (judge or jury). Most legal professionals are happy with the general system we have because it provides representation and an opportunity for both sides to argue and be heard equitably. Criticisms include an inherent advantage for people who can afford better lawyers and a system that maybe doesn't value the truth over advocacy skills. Some people would just prefer a magistrate to sit in a room and rifle through the facts of each case and come to a decision, but I would aver that advocacy allows for situations where perhaps the facts do not support the "truthful" or "right" decision to resolve themselves. Criticism abounds, but I would say that there is little more American than the adversarial system, whatever its faults.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoWhy is the adversary system of law a necessity to produce just results?
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a sentence with the word adversary system?
He used such adversary in his group.
What is the explanation for the adversarial system and inquisitorial system?
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.
What is different between inquisitorial system and adverserial system?
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.
What is the difference between an inquisitorial system and an adversarial system?
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.
Advesarial judicial system and inquisitorial?
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.
Why do you call the respiratory and the digestive system asystem?
a system is a collection of parts that when working together produce the required results
What type of adversary system does OPSEC identify?
Intelligence
Differences between inquisitorial and adversarial system?
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries
What are the distinguishing factors between inquisitorial and adversarial system?
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.
What type of observance adversary system does OPSEC identify?
Intelligence
What type of observance adversary system does OPSEC indentify?
Intelligence
What are the major differences between the adversary and inquisitorial systems of justice?
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries .
