0
The Bayeux Tapestry is important because most art during the Medieval Times were based on only Christianity. Only the few paintings such as the Bayeux Tapestry were actual paintings that showed the daily life of peasants, through showing the life of William the Conqueror. Basically, this tapestry was what showed us how the Medieval people lived and how they went through with their lives.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoIt explains the history of an important period of time. (The winner of the Battle of HHastings was duke William of Normandy) This was important because the culture that was introduced is the culture that England and other formally Enlish countries (like America and Australia) still hold.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoWhile the information being "recorded" on the Bayeux tapestry is from likely a bias position, it is the closest thing we have to a photograph of the event itself. Even modern photographs can be positioned, edited what have you to depict a bias. Nevertheless, even in abstract, there is factual information.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agomy name is bayeux tapestry how has your day gone did ur boyfriend dump you ohh noo poor u am still with mine looky mee xx :P
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe bayeux tapestry is an important historical source because it shows what really happened at The Battle of Hastings!
Hope That It Helps You :D
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoBecause the Bayeux Tapestry is an essential piece that explains the Battle of Hastings. And because it was the only piece of art that shows what happened at the Battle of Hastings.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agousefu
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was the bayeux tapestry what does it show us what kind of source is it?
the bayeux tapestry is a giant picture of 1066 pictures of 1000-1090 primary source it is
Why is the bayeux tapestry accurate?
they have a very open source and they are 100% accurat
Where in France is the Bayeux Tapestry?
Bayeux is a commune in the Calvados department in Normandy in northwestern France. Bayeux is the home of the Bayeux Tapestry, which depicts the events leading up to the Norman conquest of England.
What is one possible of using the tapestry as a historical source?
A tapestry could be used as a primary source. The fabric used and the theme can tell historians a lot, but not the entire story. Example is the Unicorn Tapestries are among the most beautiful and complex works of art from the late Middle Ages. There is a lot of symbolism in the work and yet historians have to guess at meanings and who made it. To understand sources historians have to understand what happened in history the Bayeux tapestry does exactly that .
Why is the bayeux tapestry a good source of primary evidence?
The Bayeux Tapestry is a useful primary resource because it was made by people who were around at the time, which is what makes it primary. It is useful because it is one of few pieces of evidence used to represent what happened.
What was the bayeux tapestry what does it show us what kind of source is it?
the bayeux tapestry is a giant picture of 1066 pictures of 1000-1090 primary source it is
Why is the bayeux tapestry accurate?
they have a very open source and they are 100% accurat
Would you consider the Bayeux Tapestry a primary source or a secondary source?
Are you talking about the tapestry itself as a textile, or are you talking about information portrayed on the tapestry?
Where in France is the Bayeux Tapestry?
Bayeux is a commune in the Calvados department in Normandy in northwestern France. Bayeux is the home of the Bayeux Tapestry, which depicts the events leading up to the Norman conquest of England.
Why is the bayeux tapestry an important source?
it provides a history of the Battle of Hastings one of the primary events in English history. It also shows the skills of Middle Ages art and weaving.
What is one possible of using the tapestry as a historical source?
A tapestry could be used as a primary source. The fabric used and the theme can tell historians a lot, but not the entire story. Example is the Unicorn Tapestries are among the most beautiful and complex works of art from the late Middle Ages. There is a lot of symbolism in the work and yet historians have to guess at meanings and who made it. To understand sources historians have to understand what happened in history the Bayeux tapestry does exactly that .
Is a medieval tapestry a primary source?
Yes, they are considered to be primary sources. Perhaps one of the best examples of this is the Bayeux tapestry which depicts the Norman conquest of England. Tapestries are not to be underestimated as source material as despite their pictorial format they provide information about the sort of views that were contemporary with the historical event you're looking into. For example, within the Bayeux tapestry you will find King Harold as being referred to as "Rex" which is the Latin for King. However, by the end of the 11th century Norman sources do not actually refer to him as a King. In this sense you can see how chroniclers are presentinghistory to fit the views of the Norman house.
Why is the bayeux tapestry a good source of primary evidence?
The Bayeux Tapestry is a useful primary resource because it was made by people who were around at the time, which is what makes it primary. It is useful because it is one of few pieces of evidence used to represent what happened.
What was bad about William the conqurors claim to the throne?
Its bad because of problems with the evidence that he is the rightful claimant. The Bayeux Tapestry depicts that Harold offered the throne to William in the form of an oath. However, The Bayeux Tapestry doesn't explain why Harold was in Normandy, nor does it illustrate what the oath he swore was. Moreover, the Tapestry was made during 1070's and therefore not close to the event date. The other source that portrays Williams Claim was through William of Poitiers even though he was not present.
Why is the bateaux tapestry not useful to historians?
It is from a Norman perspective ( which means it is biased) seamstresses were not at the battle and were told what happened (the info passed on could be false) ----------- That is an extremely uninsightful, and incorrect, answer. The Bayeaux tapestry is immensely useful to historians. First and most important, it shows us the Norman perspective of the battle, which has historical value in it sown right. Second, it contains subtle commentary by the embroiderers (who many historians believe were Saxon) in a series of tiny figures worked into the borders of the tapestry, ranging from mythological to satirical. They give us insight into the mindset of the people working on the piece. Lastly, the manner in which the tapestry has been interpreted down through the centuries offers insight into the values and historical perspective of each time period involved. There have been whole books written about that one aspect of the work. To say that the piece has "no historical value" because the events it depicts may reflect the writer's (embroiderer's) cultural perspective is extremely simplistic, and presupposes that the historical record is normally accurate and pure. Josephus did not personally witness every event he recorded in ancient Rome, yet we consider his writings an important part of the historical record. even though we recognize his cultural bias. While the Bayeaux Tapestry is not a primary source, it is a valuable secondary source that offers historians a wealth of information on the world the Conquest took place in, as well as the event itself.
What is an historical source?
a place or source that one may find historical information or artifacts.
Are considered an important historical source of information that are valuable because they provide information about a wide variety of people?
Old letters
