The Bayeux Tapestry, while a valuable historical artifact depicting the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, cannot be fully trusted as an objective source because it was created with a specific political agenda. Commissioned by Bishop Odo, the half-brother of William the Conqueror, the tapestry portrays events in a way that supports Norman claims to power and may exaggerate their heroism while downplaying or demonizing the Anglo-Saxon resistance. Additionally, its artistic interpretations and omissions may reflect biases of the time, making it essential to corroborate its narrative with other historical sources.
That depends on which tapestry. I'm going to guess you're asking about the Bayeux Tapestry, which depicts the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
The Bayeux Tapestry is its name although it is not technically a tapestry, but rather a long embroidered cloth.If you are interested in tapestry, these sites may inform you further:http://hastings1066.com/www.bayeuxtapestry.org.uk
The Bayuex Tapestry told historians how weapons were handeled at this time. Such as the over hand use of the lance (not commonly) and the size and shape of the sheilds.
The Bayeux Tapestry is an embroidered cloth measuring about 70 meters long, depicting the events leading up to the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, particularly the Battle of Hastings. It is significant not only as a historical record but also as a masterpiece of medieval art, showcasing the craftsmanship and storytelling techniques of the time. The tapestry illustrates both the political and social context of the period, providing insight into the lives and customs of the people involved. Additionally, it serves as an important artifact for understanding Norman and Anglo-Saxon history.
We do not trust the Bayeux Tapestry because it was written from a Norman point of view, this means that the Normans could have exaggerated their victory or left out great things that the Saxons did. They did this to make themselves sound greater and more powerful than they actually were. As a result of this, it made viewers think of the Normans as alot better than the Saxons.
nothing
cotton and silk
The Bayeux Tapestry is actually an embroidery, and it was not made in Bayeux but in England.
Because it was to long to write down and they wouldn't get the full story
Scene by scene images and the history of the Bayeux tapestry is available from the bayuex website included in the link below.
That depends on which tapestry. I'm going to guess you're asking about the Bayeux Tapestry, which depicts the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
The Bayeux Tapestry is its name although it is not technically a tapestry, but rather a long embroidered cloth.If you are interested in tapestry, these sites may inform you further:http://hastings1066.com/www.bayeuxtapestry.org.uk
The Bayuex Tapestry told historians how weapons were handeled at this time. Such as the over hand use of the lance (not commonly) and the size and shape of the sheilds.
it is good
not necessarily maybe
July 14,1077 was when it was finished. This means that it took 10 years to finish..or something like that (:
The Bayeux Tapestry is an embroidered cloth measuring about 70 meters long, depicting the events leading up to the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, particularly the Battle of Hastings. It is significant not only as a historical record but also as a masterpiece of medieval art, showcasing the craftsmanship and storytelling techniques of the time. The tapestry illustrates both the political and social context of the period, providing insight into the lives and customs of the people involved. Additionally, it serves as an important artifact for understanding Norman and Anglo-Saxon history.