The Bayuex Tapestry told historians how weapons were handeled at this time. Such as the over hand use of the lance (not commonly) and the size and shape of the sheilds.
It is likely the Normans used the Bayeux tapestry to justify their invasion, and therefore is highly likely to be bias when depicting the Norman invasion. Moreover, the Bayeux Tapestry was made during the 1070's yet displays events even before 1066. It also only shows images and very little text and consequently, important events are unclear.
The Bayeux Tapestry is a useful primary resource because it was made by people who were around at the time, which is what makes it primary. It is useful because it is one of few pieces of evidence used to represent what happened.
We do not trust the Bayeux Tapestry because it was written from a Norman point of view, this means that the Normans could have exaggerated their victory or left out great things that the Saxons did. They did this to make themselves sound greater and more powerful than they actually were. As a result of this, it made viewers think of the Normans as alot better than the Saxons.
A military history professor at the University of Illinois mentioned that medieval warrior bishops often used clubs because they were forbidden as men of the cloth to cut or pierce the skin in violence. A useful way to get around the "Thou Shalt Not Kill" thing.
In medieval times, chalkboards were primarily used by teachers in schools and by scholars in universities for educational purposes. They served as a surface for writing and illustrating concepts, making it easier to teach and learn. While not as common as parchment or other writing materials, chalkboards facilitated interactive learning and were particularly useful in the study of mathematics and grammar.
because some of the information was false
It is likely the Normans used the Bayeux tapestry to justify their invasion, and therefore is highly likely to be bias when depicting the Norman invasion. Moreover, the Bayeux Tapestry was made during the 1070's yet displays events even before 1066. It also only shows images and very little text and consequently, important events are unclear.
The Bayeux Tapestry is a useful primary resource because it was made by people who were around at the time, which is what makes it primary. It is useful because it is one of few pieces of evidence used to represent what happened.
We do not trust the Bayeux Tapestry because it was written from a Norman point of view, this means that the Normans could have exaggerated their victory or left out great things that the Saxons did. They did this to make themselves sound greater and more powerful than they actually were. As a result of this, it made viewers think of the Normans as alot better than the Saxons.
at medieval times
A military history professor at the University of Illinois mentioned that medieval warrior bishops often used clubs because they were forbidden as men of the cloth to cut or pierce the skin in violence. A useful way to get around the "Thou Shalt Not Kill" thing.
The unicorn is a mythical creature. As such, it is useful in story telling.
no because they are telling children to by and use ipads
They are used to locate information in the text by telling the reader where to look.
constellations useful to people because they give direction to man,or telling them what is the right time to harvest crops.
The source which is telling about the execution of King Charles is largely considered to be useful due to their first hand knowledge. This gives unique insight into the process which would otherwise go unknown.
I find this one very useful.