There is nothing inherently unfair about the US method of electing the president, All qualified candidates have an equal chance and the system has been proven to work for over 200 years. No country has ever seen such a long procession of good leaders, and who have come from all walks of life, rich and poor.
Congress would elect them.
It was not being chosen by the commons people.This is why today there is an electoral college.
To nominate candidates.
caucus
Jilop
why did president Truman create the fair deal?well he created the fair deal because he wanted to find what his purpose was in life.
throughput
A fair test is the goal of many an enquiry. A test should not be biassed by the selection of subject, by the test method itself, nor by the method of analysis.
the president makes sure that the laws are fair and right.
why do some people feel that the electoral collage is not a fair way to elect the president
I'm guessing this is a probability question. A die (or coin, or spinner, or roulette wheel, or other method of choosing something randomly) is fair if each possibility (1,2,3,4,5,6) has an equal chance of coming up. Anything that isn't fair is biased. For example a die that has been weighted to make 6s come up is biased.
The electors who choose the President were considered to be representatives of the individual states. The states were allowed to determine their own method of choosing their electors, but I think the expectation was the state legislatures would choose them.