answersLogoWhite

0

It is good evidence of continental drift as fossils of previous duck billed platypuses were found in America and Alaska, which Australia was once connected to. This means the platypuses once lived there hence evidence of continental drift.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why would the fossil of an ocean fish found on two different continents not be good evidence for continental drift?

lol


Why is cynognathus a good candidate for providing evidence for the continental drift theory?

Cynognathus is a good candidate for providing evidence for the continental drift theory because its fossil has been found in both South America and Africa, which were once connected in the supercontinent Gondwana. This distribution pattern supports the idea of continental drift, as it suggests that these continents were once joined together and later drifted apart.


Why would the fossils of an ocean fish found on two diffrent continents would not be good evidence of continental drift?

Fossil of an ocean fish found on two different continents would not be good evidence of continental drift because Fossils of land animals are a better piece of evidence of continental drift than fish.


How does Continental Drift work?

Continental drift is the theory that the Earth's continents move slowly across the surface over time due to the shifting of tectonic plates. This movement is driven by the convective currents in the Earth's mantle, causing the plates to separate, collide, or slide past each other. The process of continental drift has led to the formation and breakup of supercontinents over millions of years.


Why would the fossil of an ocean fish found on two different continent not be good evidence of continental drift?

its not the answer i got from my text book so dont listen 2 tht person............................


Why would the fossil on an ocean fish found on two different continents not be good evidence on continental drift?

its not the answer i got from my text book so dont listen 2 tht person............................


Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?

Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.


What are hawaiian volcanoes a good example of?

Volcanos over a hot spot. Also continental (or plate) drift.


What are good examples of Hawaiian volcanoes?

Volcanos over a hot spot. Also continental (or plate) drift.


What is a good sentence for continental drift?

The term 'continental crust' is a compound noun, a word for therelatively thick part of the earth's crust that forms the large landmasses. A noun functions in a sentence as the subject of a sentence or a clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition. Examples:Bobby has no idea what a continental crust is. I explained to him that continental crust is land (territory).


What of the 2 landmasses seem to fit together the best?

The coastlines of South America and Africa seem to fit together the best because of their similar shapes and continental shelf structures. This is a key piece of evidence supporting the theory of continental drift.


What evidence is there to show that the continents were joined together?

because when continental drift happened it split fossils and when people found the fossils in one continent.It matched with other continents fossils.making a hypothesis that they were once joined together...................................your welcomeif you write this that would be bad and you will go to jail....good luck dick sucker