Because the future cashflows are more uncertain for a stock than a bond.
Preferred stock would be more like Common stock, because the value can go up or down. Bonds have a set value.
Common stock is riskier than bonds. Common stock fluctuates in price as a matter of course. Bonds tell you What they will pay, When they will pay it and For How Long they will pay it. Assuming the company doesn't go into default, bonds are safe. (The risk of bonds is that companies DO go into default, which is why bonds are rated.)
Earnings per share on common stock are always lower.
Citigroup
citigroup
Preferred stock would be more like Common stock, because the value can go up or down. Bonds have a set value.
common stock, preferred stock, and bonds
Earnings per share on common stock are always lower.
Common stock is riskier than bonds. Common stock fluctuates in price as a matter of course. Bonds tell you What they will pay, When they will pay it and For How Long they will pay it. Assuming the company doesn't go into default, bonds are safe. (The risk of bonds is that companies DO go into default, which is why bonds are rated.)
Citigroup
citigroup
Assets in this type of fund are usually invested in a combination of conservative bonds, preferred stock, and common stock
Unlike common stock, preferred stock can be converted to bonds at the discretion of the owner. The government, by buying preferred stock, gets the rapid growth of stock with the safety of bonds. If there is any money left over after bankruptcy, bond holders are paid first. If there is any money left, after that, common stockholders are paid.
common stock, preferred stock, and bonds
common stock, preferred stock, and bonds
TRUE
TRUE