People say that Wikipedia is an unreliable source because anyone can change what it says, however, if moderators catch someone making a stupid edit, they will return the text to it's original so Wikipedia is a reliable source.
an unrealiable samurai
wow this website is so unrealiable
No, it is generally not recommended to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
It is generally not acceptable to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
source wikipedia
only one character
Wikipedia is a tertiary source (which is a document that exists to serve as an index of primary sources). According to Wikipedia, "As tertiary sources, encyclopedias and textbooks attempt to summarize and consolidate the source materials into an overview, but may also present subjective commentary and analysis (which are characteristics of a secondary source)."
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
Genoa. Source Wikipedia
yes they are source wikipedia
Source- wikipedia.