'There is a concept in English and many other languages called "grammatical person", which describes the relationship of the speaker to the event.
The conjugation of a verb depends on both the grammatical person and singular/plural.
First person: I (singular) am a teacher. We (plural) are teachers.
Second person: You (singular) are a teacher. You (plural) are teachers.
Third person: He (singular) is a teacher. They (plural) are teachers.'
The use of "you" as both singular and plural is a feature of the English language that evolved over time. In many languages, such as Italian or French, there are distinct words for addressing one person (singular) versus multiple people (plural). English, however, only has "you" for both singular and plural, which can sometimes lead to confusion.
No oxes is not the plural for ox its oxen.
Both "syllabus" and "syllabuses" are considered correct plural forms. "Syllabi" is also commonly used as the plural of "syllabus."
No, "cortex" is a singular noun. Its plural form is "cortices."
No you wouldn't Bison is plural and singular
Still lice the plural form is the same as the singular form
The plural is also flatus.
also
Horsepower is also the plural form.
The plural form is also mumps.
yeah but it can also be used for not-plural purposes
The English plural of "symposium" is "symposiums" or "symposia." Both forms are commonly accepted and used.
The plural of moose is moose. Unlike many nouns in English, the word "moose" is both singular and plural, meaning it does not change when referring to more than one moose.
The Latin plural is syllabi. But the English plural syllabuses is also used.
Vertebrae is the plural form of vertebra.
No. The plural of ax (or axe) is axes.(This is also the plural of the word axis.)
The Latin plural is syllabi. But the English plural syllabuses is also used.
The plural form of gnu is also gnu.