Energy is lost through metabolism.
It captures the energy from sunlight as chemical energy.
You can prove that isnt a chemical change because it is just a change of appearance which is considered a physical change.
The ecosystem is where we live, our environment, containing our sustinence and our shelter. I believe you phrased the question wrong, ecosystem isnt located in one particular place, there is no source it's all around us.
Sperm cells need a tail to get food or energy while the egg isnt alive yet to need emergy......?
The predator eats the prey in the food chain. As the population is stable, the food chain won't wreck. There's an interdependence between the prey and the predator in the food chain. The prey should be there to feed some food to their predator, and the predator also needs to be there to control their prey population from exploding. Changes in animal population can wreck the food chain. If the prey population decreases, the predator population would also decrease as there'll be less food for them to eat. If the predator population decreases, the prey population would increase because less predators means less preys gets hunted down, so there'll be more preys. If the prey population increases, then the predator population would also increase because there'll be more food for them to eat and there should be more predators to take more control patrol of their prey population. If the predator population increases, then the prey population would decrease because more predators means more preys gets hunted down, so there'll be less preys. Animal Population Change Formula: Prey Decrease→Predator Decrease Predator Decrease→Prey Increase Prey Increase→Predator Increase Predator Increase→Prey Decrease
there isnt one exept one is the predator and one is prey
there isnt really any use
no it isnt
It captures the energy from sunlight as chemical energy.
Yes.
in my opinion its probbaly a chemical chnage because the shampoo you put in your hair isnt makeing it fall out.
Nutrients are chemical compounds; they contain molecules - and the molecules are formed from chemical elements.
it isnt the same
There isnt a certain part, the sun undergoes nuclear fusion, which is basically hydrogen and helium 'fusing' together. This causes a chemical reaction and lets out huge amounts of energy (light and heat) for billions of years. But mainly the inner core, which is 27000000 degrees Fahrenheit.
if I want to show you then I will but wendy isnt here and she passed away (maybe)
You can prove that isnt a chemical change because it is just a change of appearance which is considered a physical change.
some people say it isnt if its the sun, so if u mean the the sun then no, it is not renewable. solar energy itself, you PROBABLY could...