Because historian carefully study the remnants of older civilisations like ruins and documents most carefully and double-check their information and sources before jumping to any conclusions.
History is a science because, the method used to evaluate historical sources is closely related to the scientific method. In school, history is considered a "social science."
No it isn't. History would not be considered a science. Its lack of predictive value would disqualify it from being a science. It is nevertheless a valuable record of happenings, though perhaps only a partial record, for "History is written by the winners", as the phrase goes.
it isnt
it isnt that important once you get a job
considered is not science. It is a word
Because they are big and drafty.
Yes, history is considered a social science because it involves the study of human societies, behaviors, and interactions over time. It analyzes past events and their impact on societies, cultures, and individuals, making it a valuable field in understanding human development and the forces that shape our world today.
Science in History was created in 1954.
No, science is not typically considered a liberal art. Liberal arts traditionally refer to subjects like literature, philosophy, and history, while science is usually categorized separately as a field of study focused on the natural world and empirical evidence.
For most of the history of medicine, it was considered an art or skill that frequently had connections to the religious and philosophical beliefs of each culture. This was until the advent of medical science in the 19th century.
How isn't it? Science is the method of understanding the natural world. Is not History part of the natural world and has not Science been used in history?
i dont know isnt that what i asked you?