Want this question answered?
The train, on account of being the heaviest.
They would be traveling at the same speed. Two objects moving with the same velocity must be moving in the same direction and at the same speed. The reason for this is because velocity is speed in a specified direction. Another way to say that is to say that velocity is speed with a direction vector. It is a physical quantity with magnitude and direction. Two objects moving with the same speed could be moving toward a head-on collision. Or they could be moving along convergent, divergent or skewed paths. Not so with two objects that have identical velocities. They are moving on the same or on parallel courses, and they are moving at the same speed.
The speed of the object will increase.
When the speed of an object remains the same - it does not increase or decrease - we say it is moving at a constant speed.
The speed of the object will increase.
A parked semi truck has no momentum. A moving bicycle does. If both the bike and the truck are moving at the same speed in the same direction, the truck will have more because it has more mass.
The train, on account of being the heaviest.
The easy answer would be that it's the same as its weight, which could be something between 9-13 kg.
Yes. You have to be traveling with the flow of traffic. A bicycle is considered a vehicle therefore all the same moving laws of a car apply to a bicycle while on the road.
Technically, an object moving at a constant speed on a flat surface doesn't gain or lose any energy. (Also technically, energy is never 'consumed'; it only changes from one form to another, or gets transfered from one body to another.) If a car and a bicycle both roll down the same ramp, the car has more energy of motion when they reach the bottom. If a car and a bicycle are both standing at a stop light, both take off when the light changes, and both accelerate together to 10 mph, the caruses more energy than the bicycle to get up to the same speed.
They would be traveling at the same speed. Two objects moving with the same velocity must be moving in the same direction and at the same speed. The reason for this is because velocity is speed in a specified direction. Another way to say that is to say that velocity is speed with a direction vector. It is a physical quantity with magnitude and direction. Two objects moving with the same speed could be moving toward a head-on collision. Or they could be moving along convergent, divergent or skewed paths. Not so with two objects that have identical velocities. They are moving on the same or on parallel courses, and they are moving at the same speed.
They would be traveling at the same speed. Two objects moving with the same velocity must be moving in the same direction and at the same speed. The reason for this is because velocity is speed in a specified direction. Another way to say that is to say that velocity is speed with a direction vector. It is a physical quantity with magnitude and direction. Two objects moving with the same speed could be moving toward a head-on collision. Or they could be moving along convergent, divergent or skewed paths. Not so with two objects that have identical velocities. They are moving on the same or on parallel courses, and they are moving at the same speed.
The speed of the object will increase.
When you are moving with the same speed as the object and in the same direction.
No, they are not the same! Velocity involves the speed and the direction of the moving object...
Yes. If an object is moving at a constant speed the average speed and the constant speed are the same.
The general consensus is yes, Albert Einstein conceived of his theory of relativity while riding his bicycle. It is said that: "while riding his bicycle at night Einstein observed that [the] beam cast from his headlamp always traveled at the same speed whether he was cruising at a quick speed or coasting to stop." Thus the theory - light from a moving source has the same velocity as light from a stationary source. Unfortunately, this information is merely a "tale." It has not been historically proven.