Why may it have been a bad idea to drop the Atomic bombs on Japan?
Because the atomic bombs killed many more Japanese civilians than it did military personel.
Do you agree with the decision made by the United States to drop atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in order to end the war with Japan?
It was not limited to 2 cities! The US was going to drop atomic bombs on Japan as fast as the bombs could be made available for use. There were already plans in place even before the first atomic bomb was tested in New Mexico to make and drop 23 atomic bombs on Japan before the end of 1945. Had Japan not surrender after the first 2, the atomic bombing would have continued as planned…
What type of atomic bombs did America drop on Japan?
Easy. Basically there were two types of nuclear bombs (Atomic bombs). One is fusion and the other is fission. Fusion bombs are Hydrogen bombs that were only invented and tested on 1950s. When America drop the bombs on Japan , it was fission type. Both Uranium and Plutonium in Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively.
It is not necessary to drop atomic bomb to end the war?
It could have not been necessary to drop the atomic bombs to end the war. That would have meant invading Japan. Think Iwo Jima times 10 million. We would have had millions of casulties. Also, we would have lost most of our (the U.S.) fleet because of Japanese kamakasies. In the end, the Atomic bombs saved more lives than the lives lost. The soilders would have had to kill all the Japanese in Japan that…