Want this question answered?
They are closely related. Ethnocentrism is when you are so wrapped up in your own culture or society that you are not really aware that some people behave differently. For example, some Americans might speak to a person from another country and ask "Who is your president?" not being aware that not all countries have presidents, or indeed that American law is not in force outside of the borders of the United States. Isolationism is a deliberate foreign policy to not involve one's country in the issues of the wider world. China pursued an isolationist policy for centuries. Having an isolationist or imperialist foreign policy can lead to ethnocentrism.
Ethnocentrism a noun.
Ethnocentrism can be both good and bad.
"How strongly do you agree with the statement: 'My culture is superior to others'?"
Ethnocentrism is the judgement of another culture based on the standards of one's own ethnicity. It limits people because they might not communicate with others based on their stereotypes. This prevents people from interacting with each other.
One of the bad things of isolationism is that it can lead to bad things happening in other countries. These bad things can at some point impact your own country. Another bad thing about it is that it can lead a country to not really understand what is happening in other parts of the world. This can be dangerous.
Cultural ethnocentrism.
Cultural relativism was in part a response to western ethnocentrism
A banana. It has absolutely nothing to do with ethnocentrism and so is a perfect non-example.
The main difference between ethnocentrism and xenocentrism is the preference of culture. Ethnocentrism is a preference to your own culture standards while xenocentrism is a preference to different cultures.
the advantages of isolationism is that the war will be 'nothing to do with you',
Isolationism