Because the proof lies in doing the thing. If you cant do it again then there is no proof.
They draft a hypothesis, investigate it. Next, they conduct several experiment's, if they can get good repeatable results others test it. Then it is improved or accepted and over time it may change or disappear completely.
C. Repeatable
observation
observation
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
They draft a hypothesis, investigate it. Next, they conduct several experiment's, if they can get good repeatable results others test it. Then it is improved or accepted and over time it may change or disappear completely.
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
If , then, and because.
The importance of the scientific method is to find the universal truth in investigation & concluded through universally accepted experimental methodology.
That science is repeatable, testable, and accountable. A prediction must be tested to be accepted and it can be tested countless times to determine if it fails.
scientist accepted bohr's model as a useful explanation (apex)
scientist accepted bohr's model as a useful explanation (apex)