Want this question answered?
The answer to the test must include physical evidence.
logical and respect the rules of evidence, consistent with experimental and observational evidence about nature, and clearly reported to enhance opportunities for further investigation.
When Alka-Seltzer and water come into contact it creates a reaction that produces gas. This is evident by the fizzing bubbles. In order to support the law of conservation of mass you would need to capture and measure the gas.
Physical evidence is when you can prove that someone was at the scene. Like fingerprints, DNA or an eyewitness. It must be proven with facts showing that they were physically there.
In a Colloquial sense, yes, in common day speech, a theory is simply an educated opinion, however, in a scientific context, A theory is the highest degree of proof available, in science, a theory is the combination of all available data on a particular matter that allows a person to establish knowledge on a preexistent hypothesis. To be a theory, something must not contradict existing knowledge, it must have faced scrutiny and survived, and must have made apt predictions that have been confirmed by rigorous experimentation. I hope that helps :)
This statement is incorrect. You must have evidence to support any opinion you give - whether it is a paper, a speech, a conversation, or just a paragraph! The way that you prove what you are saying is by giving evidence to support it.
When working through an idea using the rules of the scientific method, you first must start out with a statement of what you hope to find or prove. It's the "What I want to find" to the Method & Methodologies' "How I am going to find it." Even if the data or evidence fail(s) to support it, you still need the statement of purpose. If the statement and results are not a good fit, then the statement (hypothesis) can be revised or thrown out.
When working through an idea using the rules of the scientific method, you first must start out with a statement of what you hope to find or prove. It's the "What I want to find" to the Method & Methodologies' "How I am going to find it." Even if the data or evidence fail(s) to support it, you still need the statement of purpose. If the statement and results are not a good fit, then the statement (hypothesis) can be revised or thrown out.
The best way to support or refute a thesis statement is with factual evidence. You can bring in outside sources that either prove or oppose the thesis statement. You should be able to provide a variety of sources so that you can examine the thesis statement from multiple angles.
No
require support
When an author makes a statement, they are expressing a claim or belief that can be persuasive or informative. The statement may be based on evidence, reasoning, or personal opinion, and it leaves room for debate or disagreement. It is up to the author to effectively argue their point and provide support for their statement to convince the audience of its validity.
One of the conditions that must be satisfied is that it must match the evidence that is provided. Next it should be able to predict things. Lastly, it's statement must be able to be verified independently.
No, it must not be true.
No
One of the conditions that must be satisfied is that it must match the evidence that is provided. Next it should be able to predict things. Lastly, it's statement must be able to be verified independently.
No. All evidence must be shared between the prosecutor and the defense lawyer through the process of discovery. A prosecutor cannot withhold evidence.