hell yeah
No, Because if they were boys would of distracted the girls or maybe opposite.
Boys were taught their fathers trade. They went to school, girls didn't
By their parents at home.
No, Victorian boys and girls did not learn the same subjects. Boys were typically taught subjects like Latin, mathematics, and science, while girls were often taught skills like needlework, music, and basic arithmetic. Education was not seen as important for girls in the same way it was for boys during the Victorian era.
The boys went to school while some girls was taught house keeping and to look after their family and majority of the other girls was home schooled
It is a very well taught Cheerleading system for girls and boys
because most of the boys are passionable with their body power. But girls are passionable with their kind's of taught which make them more comfort.
No, girls should go to a mixed school (boys and girls) because it will be easier for girls to talk to boys when they are older.
Boys and girls should be in separate classes because the boys fall behind quicker, and interact better with guys. Girls interact better with girls.
Yes, the boys and the girls were separated in classes.
It was rare, but occasionally a girl would be taught hieroglyphics. Most schooling was open only to boys.
Carol Gilligan