0
Why should historians make sound generalizations rather than oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Sound generalizations can accommodate a variety of complex sources.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What two types of sources that historians have?
Primary sources and secondary sources. Primary sources are firsthand accounts or direct evidence of an event, while secondary sources are interpretations, analysis, or commentary on primary sources.
What kind of equipment does CSI use?
CSI teams use a variety of equipment including fingerprint kits, evidence collection tools like swabs and containers, forensic light sources, cameras for documenting crime scenes, and computers for analyzing evidence. They also use specialized tools such as alternate light sources, forensic imaging software, and evidence packaging materials.
How is conventional sources of energy different from conventional sources?
Conventional sources are the same as conventional sources.
What are light sources and non light sources?
The sources that can give out their own light are "Light Sources" and the same opposite the sources which can not give out their own light are know as Non Light Sources .
What is sources and types of sources?
Sources refer to the origins of information used in research or study. Types of sources may include primary sources (original documents or first-hand accounts), secondary sources (interpretations or analyses of primary sources), and tertiary sources (reference materials summarizing and organizing information). Other sources can be books, articles, websites, interviews, surveys, and experiments.
Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence. -apex
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of analyzing historical sources?
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
What are techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
How do historians make inferences?
Historians make inferences by analyzing and interpreting historical sources such as documents, artifacts, and other evidence to draw conclusions about the past. They consider the context in which the sources were created, corroborate information from multiple sources, and apply critical thinking skills to construct plausible explanations about historical events and developments.
One area of study that requires the use of many primary sources when presenting a topic would be?
the field of history. Historians often rely on primary sources such as letters, diaries, and official documents to gain firsthand accounts and evidence of past events. By analyzing these sources, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of historical events and their significance.
What tools do historians use?
Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
How do historians use methods of inquiry to identify cause and effect?
Historians use methods such as analyzing primary sources, conducting research, and evaluating evidence to identify cause and effect in historical events. By examining multiple sources, looking for patterns, and considering various perspectives, historians can identify and interpret the relationships between events to determine causes and effects. This helps them create a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of history.
What are the two sources that historians use?
primary sources and secondary sources.
Which best explains how a historian synthesize evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
What tools do historians?
historians use primary soucres and secondary sources
Why are sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians and why?
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
