0
Why should historians make sound generalizations rather than oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Sound generalizations can accommodate a variety of complex sources.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What two types of sources that historians have?
The two different sources are primary and secondary sources
Why are sources important?
Source documents are important so we can see what was really happening during any one period of time. If we relay on second hand accounts, we will take on the biases of the authors.
How is conventional sources of energy different from conventional sources?
Conventional sources are the same as conventional sources.
What are the two sources of sound?
Irregular Sources and Regular Sources
What are light sources and non light sources?
The sources that can give out their own light are "Light Sources" and the same opposite the sources which can not give out their own light are know as Non Light Sources .
Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence. -apex
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of analyzing historical sources?
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
One area of study that requires the use of many primary sources when presenting a topic would be?
the field of history. Historians often rely on primary sources such as letters, diaries, and official documents to gain firsthand accounts and evidence of past events. By analyzing these sources, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of historical events and their significance.
What tools do historians use?
Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
What are the two sources that historians use?
primary sources and secondary sources.
What tools do historians?
historians use primary soucres and secondary sources
Why are sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians and why?
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
What two types of sources that historians have?
The two different sources are primary and secondary sources
After writers gather evidence from primary sources they then create secondary sources by analyzing their findings and?
writing about them
What tools historians use?
historians use primary soucres and secondary sources
Because all sources are biased historians approach sources with what?
skeptism
