Excellent questiion - for a debate or discussion. However, this is not the proper venue to ask, because there is no definitive answer to it.
When the owner of him/her desides they should be freed.
When they realised that he was innocent his lawyers insisted that he should be freed immediately.
Yes but then afterwards they should be shot
Escaped slaves should be freed from bondage as slavery is unethical and goes against the principles of human rights and freedom. It is important to prioritize the well-being and autonomy of individuals over the property rights of slave owners.
That India should be freed from under British rule.
Some states passed laws that kept freed slaves from exercising their right to vote
he onced lived in the North where slavery was prohibited
he was freed by
Pilate had the choice between a miscarriage of Justice or a dangerous riot. He chose to sacrifice the one man rather than make a decision which could have caused the deaths of many of his soldiers and many more civilians.
Some college leaders believed that freed slaves should learn practical skills like agriculture and trades in order to become self-sufficient and economically independent. They also believed that by acquiring these skills, freed slaves could contribute positively to society and uplift their communities.
Some colleges believed that freed slaves should receive education because they saw it as an opportunity to integrate these individuals into society and improve the overall welfare of the country. Additionally, education was seen as a way to promote equality and empower freed slaves to gain economic independence and contribute to the nation's development.
Dred Scott argued that he should be freed from slavery because his owner had taken him to live in free territories, which he believed should make him a free man. He claimed that his residency in these free territories should have granted him his freedom according to the principles of "once free, always free."