The only reason why cloned people have no rights yet is because A. they haven't invented them yet and B. they have not perfected them but i can assure you that when they do perfect them they will have the same rights as us!
It's mostly to do with ethics and laws. Imagine if you were to clone yourself. Would the clone have rights? Would it be a citizen? What if you killed it, or it killed you?
No it shouldnt' be illegal as people have rights they can do what they like.
you shouldnt.
We shouldnt
One would hope that if cloning were allowed, the clones would be defined as people. If they are people then they should have the same rights as people who are not cloned. If people who are not cloned have the right to clone themselves then those who are should have it as well. The word "right" can have a legal and an ethical aspect. The question might be talking about whether the practice is legal or whether it is moral. The Legal Profession treats that sort of question as money in the Bank and will vigorously defend you right to your opinion. The Religious Ethics community will likely oppose any such question until they have debated the question for several years.
No. But I'd like to see you try.
Yes, well they can but they SHOULDNT
allah thinks we shouldnt
Season 1 of The Clone Wars was enjoyed by enough people for the studios to consider it a financial success.
Alot of people have thought this will give you a virus. Indeed it now shouldnt. The old domain had issues. Now it shouldnt give viruses.
Due to the fact that people would not want to miss their cat that is dead and clone them to have another
Due to the fact that we can not clone people yet, we don't know yet, but from what we know, yes.