2001 was not a leap year as it is not divisible by 4. 2001 divided by 4 is 500 and a remainder of 1. If it was divisible by 4 there would be no remainder.
1953 is not evenly divisible by 4. It is not a leap year.
Divide the year by 4. If the remainder is 0, the year is said to be divisible by 4. Leap years are years divisible by 4, unless the year is divisible by 100, except when the year is divisible by 400. Thus, 1896 was a leap year, but 4 years later, 1900 was not a leap year because even though it is divisible by 4, it is also divisible by 100. 1996 was a leap year and so was 2000 because in addition to being divisible by 4 and 100, 2000 is also divisible by 400.
A standard solar year actually has 365.24 days; that is why some years every millennium are not leap years, even though they are divisible by 4. (They are not leap years if they are evenly divisible by 100 unless they are also evenly divisible by 400.)
=every 4 years==_______________________________________==According to the Gregorian calendar, leap years occur in any year whose number is divisible by four, except:==1. "Century" years, numbers divisible by 100, are NOT leap years, except;==2. Year numbers that are evenly divisible by 400 ARE leap years.==So 1992 and 1996 were leap years because they are divisible by 4. 1900 was NOT a leap year even though it is divisible by 4, because it is divisible by 100. And 2000 WAS a leap year because it was divisible by 400.==So 2008 was, and 2012 will be, and 2016 will be. But the year 2100 will NOT be a leap year.=
Nope. The first leap year of the 1900s was the year 1904.Every year evenly divisible by 4 is a leap year exceptthe 100's years unless they are also evenly divisible by 400 (e.g. 1600 and 2000).
It did not fit the rules to be a leap year. Leap years are evenly divisible by 4, they are also evenly divisible by 100 but NOT evenly divisible by 400. 1974 is not evenly divisible by 4. 1972 and 1976 were leap years. It is usually only every second even year that is a leap year. So 1970, 1974 and 1978 were not leap years, but 1972, 1976 and 1980 were leap years.
First, you can rule out a year being a leap year if it is an odd number, like 2013. If the year is even, is it evenly divisible by 4? If it's not evenly divisible by 4, it's not a leap year. Example: 2010 If it is evenly divisible by 4, is it evenly divisible by 100? If it's not evenly divisible by 100, it is a leap year. Example: 2012 If it is evenly divisible by 100, is it evenly divisible by 400? If it's not evenly divisible by 400, it's not a leap year. Example: 2100 If it is evenly divisible by 400, it is a leap year. Example: 2000
Leap years are any years evenly divisible by four, with two exceptions. So years like 2004 and 2008 are leap years.The two exceptions:Any "century" year evenly divisible by 100 is NOT a leap year, so 1900 was not a leap year and 2100 will not be a leap year, except:Any year number divisible by 400 IS a leap year, so 2000 was and 2400 will be leap years.Of the 1000 years between 2001 and 3000, there are 250 "divisible by 4" years, minus 10 "century" years plus 2 "divisible by 400" years (2400 and 2800) gives 242 leap years between 2001 and 3000. Add 2000, and there are 243 leap years between 2000 and 3000, inclusive.
Leap Years in the Gregorian calendar (named for Pope Gregory, who made it official) occur every 4 years, in year numbers that are evenly divisible by 4. So 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016 are all leap years. There are two exceptions. 1. For "century" years, those that are divisible by 100, these are NOT leap years. So 1900 was not a leap year, and 2100 will not be. Remember that; many of you will live to see this. Your children very probably will. 2. For century years that are divisible by 400, these ARE leap years even though point #1 says that they would not be. So 2000 was a leap year, and the year 2400 will be even though none of us will be around to see it. Every year that is a multiple of 4 will most probably be a leap year
Leap year occurs every fourth year - whenever the year is divisible by 4 unless it is also divisible by 100 but not by 400. So, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, etc. are all leap years. Even though the century years 1800, 1900, 2100, 2200 and 2300 are not leap years, but 1600, 2000, and 2400 are.
The year 3000 is not a leap year because centenary years are not leap years unless divisible by 400. (3000/400 = 7.5).
No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.No they don't. They help keep it correct. 1900 was not a leap year, though it is divisible by 4, but not having that extra day kept things in line. The rules for leap years, that meant it was not one, were designed to be that way.