There was no dynastic rulers because china split up into many small kingdoms during the warring states period
That was the age of warring states.
because they needed to have more babies by sex real hard daddy harder mmm to have rulers lol for 6 grade the sex part was required so
Well, isn't that an interesting question! During the third century before the common era, China experienced a period known as the Warring States period. This was a time of conflict and instability, with various states vying for power and control. It wasn't until the Qin Dynasty emerged victorious and unified China that dynastic rule was restored, bringing peace and stability to the land once again.
Imperialism! France had colonies in North Africa and controlled Lebanon between World Wars I and II. England controlled Palestine between World Wars I and II. France and then Britain controlled Egypt for a century. Spain has outposts on the coast of Morocco. Italy controlled Lybia.
Controlled economies were common in eastern bloc countries.
No, it is in the second century BC. As a general rule, if you do not specify BC or AD, the assumption is that you are talking about AD. Some use BCE and CE to reference 'Before Common Era' and 'Common Era' instead of the references to Christ.
The imperialist nations have in common in the 19th century was that they were industrialized.
controlled economies
The word century is a common noun. The word tenth is functioning as an adjective (not a noun) decribing the noun century.
what were three common medecines used in the 16th century england
The word century is a common noun. The word fifteenth is functioning as an adjective (not a noun) decribing the noun century.
they are controlled by humans