because he was never caught and nobody knew who he was, and he was really brutal
//'Best' is not exactly the right word for Jack The Ripper. 'Infamous' better describes the work of the unknown serial killer of Victorian-era London. The Ripper is probably the most recognized serial killer of all time for several reasons. His crimes were some of the most brutal in criminal history, not content to cut his victim's throats, but to disembowel and mutilate them, some almost beyond recognition. The fact that the killer was never caught lends the air of mystery to the killer and his crimes. Had he been discovered he may have been forgotten except to professionals who study murder. It would have put an end to the conspiracy theories and some of the more outlandish myths that have surfaced through the years. And lastly, JTR was the first serial killer to have his crimes played out in the press. The publicity surrounding his crimes was enormous, not just locally but world wide. Especially Americans, who could barely wait the two weeks it took for British newspapers to arrive by ship. These are the reasons that have made Jack The Ripper a household name, and without a doubt, synonymous with evil.
Jack the Ripper is the best known pseudonym given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished districts in and around the Whitechapel district of London in 1888.
Jack the Ripper is the best known name given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished areas in and around the Whitechapel district of London in 1888.
There are several who would be worthy of the title. Those few include BTK, the Green River Killer, and Jeffrey Dahmer. The most notorious however, would most likely be Jack the Ripper, mainly because he was never caught. If we go by numbers of victims Christman Gniperdoliga killed 964 men between the years 1568-1581 after robbing them in the Roman empire area
Without a doubt, the best known serial killer is London's Jack The Ripper. More than a century after the Ripper began killing prostitutes in Whitechapel in early 1888, he has the most recognizable name and has become a ledgend. A close runner-up would have to be Ted Bundy. Notable mentions would be John Wayne Gacy (the killer clown), Jeffrey Dahmer (the cannibal), and Aileen Wuornos, from Daytona Beach, Florida.
No, Bram Stoker did not write a book specifically about Jack the Ripper. Stoker is best known for his gothic novel "Dracula," which was published in 1897. The Jack the Ripper murders took place in 1888, and there is no direct connection between Stoker and the infamous serial killer.
I'm not sure what you mean by charts and graphs. There are multitude of books and information about The Ripper and his crimes. Probably the best known serial killer of all time, you could study this subject for years and never cover all the information.
Jack the Ripper is the best known pseudonym given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished districts in and around the Whitechapel district of London in 1888. He was never aprehended. The image has not changed for more than a century.
Jack the Ripper is the best known pseudonym given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished districts in and around the Whitechapel district of London in 1888. Since he was never aprehended, we would not know how he determine his prey was near by.
Jack the Ripper is the best known pseudonym given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished districts in and around the Whitechapel district of London in 1888. Since he was never apprehended, we don't know the information you asked. You are likely thinking of Springheel Jack, a man in costume that terrorized women in London in the 1860's. It was reputed that he could leap over houses at a single bound.
Literally hundreds of books have been written about JTR. Probably the best known serial killer, he is more popular as a subject now than he was at the time of his crimes. Countless movies have been made, not all of the dealing with the truth.
To the best of my knowledge there has never been a woman undertaker that was an accomplice to Jack The Ripper. It is more common for JTR type killers to work alone.
The best person to answer that would be Jack himself. Or maybe he was bonkers.