One perspective: Jesus was found guilty because he HAD to be found guilty. From the point of view of his accusers and judges, he WAS guilty. This is coming from the perspective of salvation history. The entire point of his life was his ultimate sacrifice on behalf of mankind. If he had not been found guilty, then what? His death was completely in keeping with the plan of salvation and his life could not possibly have turned out any differently.
Jesus was not guilty. Because he was perfect he could not sin.
Romans feared that Jesus would lead and uprising ,the Romans thought Jesus was an enemy of he state. He was then arrested and was found guilty
No. He was found not guilty
being found guilty
First Pilate said Jesus was not guilty but the Jews put preasure on him sayingif yourelease Jesus , then you are not ceasers friend.
He was first tried by the Parishes, (Jews who ran the Holy Temple). The Jews found Jesus (a Jew) guilty of blasphemy (of calling Himself the Son of God). Since the Jews did have the power to execute a blasphemer (being controlled by the Romans), they sent Him to Pointus Pilot (a Roman govenor) who found Jesus guilty of calling Himself a king and had Jesus crucified. There had to be two trials. One for the Jewish leaders and one for the leader of the Romans who occupied Israel.
guilty
guilty
They were found guilty December 8, 1992.
If you were found not guilty, you don't have a record.
Co-defendants can be sentenced differently. They do not have to all be found guilty or not guilty.
A person is never found innocent. A person is found guilty or not guilty at the verdict phase of a criminal trial.