No, he was not.
In fact, if there would have been another person in his place on the throne at that time, there still would have been a revolution. Revolutionary feelings weren't new, the bourgeoisie had already had them back in the time of Louis XIV who had build Versailles, which drained the treasury, and Louis XIV made the bourgeoisie (not the nobility and not the clergy) pay taxes to fill the huge gap. By the time it was Louis XVI's turn on the throne, France was bankrupt and taxes were sky high.
he could not make his own decisions .... he spent way to much on his lifesyle ... could not stand up and mixed his personal life wth the ruling of country
King Louis XV1 caught trying to escape from the French Revolution
The French Revoulution was caused by the taxes poor people had to pay to manage a massive National debt.
his brother ruled
King Louis XIV.
Louis XVI, who was beheaded along with his son, the [presumptive] Louis XVII. When the monarchy was restored, Louis XVIII became king.
King Louis XV1 caught trying to escape from the French Revolution
Their palace is the Chateau de Versailles in a suburb of Paris, called Versailles.
Louis XVI was the last King of France before the fall of the monarchy during the French Revolution. He was referred to as Citizen Louis Capet during the four months just before he was executed by guillotine. He was the son of Louis, Dauphin of France, son and heir-apparent of King Louis XV.
He financially and militarily supported the American Revolution. Even if the French motive was to impede the UK, it was worth it from the American standpoint.
The French Revoulution was caused by the taxes poor people had to pay to manage a massive National debt.
Weak. Indecisive. Ineffective.
He was often considered to be weak and indecisive.
16
Many consider him to have been a weak leader.
He was considered to be a weak, ineffective and indecisive leader.
his brother ruled
Heueueheh