It depends on the particular order, but it was most likely considered unreasonable because it was inordinate to achieve the necessary objectives for which it was put forward.
Despots are not enlightened or they wouldn't be despots. A despot is someone who wants to enslave people.
dog but
Spain did not have any enlightened despots. By the mid-1600s, Spain was an empire in decadence and lacked the kind of inspirational leaders found in Prussia, Russia, Austria, and France, some of whom could be called Enlightened Despots.
The goals of enlightened despots was to bring political and social change.
Enlightened Despots used their power to bring about social and political changes
Enlightened Despots were a subset of absolute monarchs that made legal, social, and educational reforms in accordance with Enlightenment principles. All Enlightened Despots were absolute monarchs, but there were a number of European absolute monarchs that were not Enlightened Despots.
The Enlightened Despots used their power to bring about some political changes as well as social.
The major enlightened despots were Frederick the Great of Prussia, Catherine the Great of Russia and Joseph II of Austria.
No
no they were not
russia,prussia,and austria
no unreasonable Searches