it is difficult for oral tradition to be a means of historical archives because humans forget. and so eventually old knowledge would be forgotten.
Accept the blame or difficulty. A dictionary definition is in the link below:
she was a woman
Along with many other Goverment bodies, the Navy now accept them, due to greater recognition about the difficulty of them
No. The President is paid a salary by the federal government, and while in office cannot accept any funds from states or private sources. His election campaigns may accept money from private sources, subject to the restrictions imposed by federal and state laws.
Yup. -sources (Singapore traveler forum post)
Call it male oppression, tradition or whatever. Basically society didn't accept females on stage.
Some of the criticism of colonial historiography in African context were: I was too bias. Regarded Africa was not a historical continent, only history existed in Africa had an external influences either from Middle East, Far east or Europe. It mainly based on written sources and out of written sources there was no history. Colonial historians put little no no attention on oral sources as a sources of reconstructing history. Also this paradigm, mainly based on guarding Europeans interests in Africa. They were busy to undermined Africa mentally and psychologically so as to accept colonial administration in their countries. colonial historiography also engaged more on explaining cultural, geographical and social. Tried to excluded critical analysis in economic motives which was a puling factor for Europeans in Africa. These are some.
------------------------ We only know what we have in the Bible. There are good grounds for believing that the story of Isaac and Ishmael is not historically true, but if we accept the biblical account (and the later Islamic tradition) then we accept that Isaac and Ishmael were brothers.
Tradition. The mitochondria have been our major energy source for about a quarter of a billion years - and they are designed to oxidize hydrogen to water.
B. The sources creator could personally benefit from convincing people to accept his argument.
Yes; it's a 3800-year old unbroken tradition going back to Abraham. See also:Jewish history timeline
The existence or non-existence of God is considered irrelevant in Buddhism - it is an experiental practice, not a doctrine. One of the main principles of Buddhism is: Do not accept anything on (mere) hearsay Do not accept anything by mere tradition Do not accept anything on account of mere rumors Do not accept anything just because it accords with your scriptures. Do not accept anything by mere suppositions. Do not accept anything by mere inference. Do not accept anything by merely considering the reasons. Do not accept anything merely because it agrees with your pre-conceived notions. Do not accept anything merely because it seems acceptable Do not accept anything thinking that the priest [saying it] is respected