Because in said that only 3 out of 5 African Americans were counted as humans.
allowed the slave states to count a slave as three-fifths of a person
The Three-Fifths Compromise determined how population would be counted for....? Representation in Congress and also direct taxes on the population of the states.
Southern states relied on slaves for their cotton production which was vital to their survival .
Three senators played a vital role in the compromise of 1850. The senators included Henry Clay, Daniel Webster and John C. Calhoun.
Depending on the context and severity, simple tests include orthostatic vital signs, evaluation of capillary refill, and palpation of temperature.
The forthcoming admission of California as a state of the Union - it was too big to fit the terms of the Missouri Compromise, so a new compromise had to be worked out.
This is a weird question ... nearly anything might NOT be part of the compromise. So ... a pitcher of iced tea was NOT part of the Missouri compromise.
The Connecticut compromise is the same exact thing as the great compromise its just another name for it. so the Connecticut compromise/ the great compromise is when the larger states wanted the representatives to be determined on population and the smaller states wanted the representatives to be determined on equality/ equal amount of people on each side for representatives. so they came up with The House of Representatives and the Senate to solve the problem. The great compromise solved a lot of problems and issues that people had.
Without compromise, it would just be constant arguing. The compromise is what makes the final decision, and obviously not every single persons opinion can be used, just taken into consideration and turned into a compromise between the other opinions.
the great compromise was when Virgina wanted states to have equal power and new jersey wanted states power to be based on population so they created the house and the senate as a compromise one equal one based on population.
compromise of 1850
I shouldn't think so; how can a mere icon in dock compromise your computer's security? So my answer has to be No. J D