It's not, mining it is. Ores are a natural part of the environment. The danger to the environment begins when "civilization" decides it needs the ores and will do almost anything to get them.
no, mining of any type is not good for the environment, it destroys the land and I feel that is wrong
Fossil fuels are bad cause they release CO2CLIMATE ChangeSurface mining scars the land
yes
subsurface is less harmful
Its bad because it hurts the environment and causes lung cancer
It's not, mining it is. Ores are a natural part of the environment. The danger to the environment begins when "civilization" decides it needs the ores and will do almost anything to get them.
Hydraulic mining
Mining can cause lots of problems, mostly environmental problems. Mining takes up space, in order for something to be mined, the environment on top must be removed. This includes trees and animals. Fortunately, in most countries there are laws which say that the environment must be restored after mining. Mining also causes a great deal of pollution, both in the air and in nearby bodies of water. Poisonous gasses can also be released during mining, which is not only bad for the wildlife but also bad for nearby towns.
The mining and burning of coal is the most damaging to the environment.
no, mining of any type is not good for the environment, it destroys the land and I feel that is wrong
mining
1. Uranium is a possible polluting agent of the natural environment. 2. Uranium is a toxic and radioactive chemical element. 3. Uranium release radium and radon.
it is helping the environment in many ways
Fossil fuels are bad cause they release CO2CLIMATE ChangeSurface mining scars the land
mining can be minimised by not being done
what are the environmental concerns surrounding the mining of the mineral topaz