because they wanted to rule them if that's what they want to do let them
congress does have complet control over the territories as it states in the constitution.READ THE CONSTITUTION!!
It made it that the US government had direct control over territories.
fear
Israel justifies its settlements in the occupied territories by citing historical and religious connections to the land, security concerns, and the need for strategic control over certain areas. They argue that the settlements are necessary for protecting Israeli citizens and maintaining a Jewish presence in these areas.
he didn't he only had control of the Jewish people within his territories
Yes, Imperialism refers to the policy in which strong nations extend their political, military, and economic control over weaker territories.
Caesar had control over Gaul before he crossed the Rubicon. Later in the Civil War, he took control of Spain.
Imperialism is the policy of stronger nations extending their control over weaker territories through military conquest, economic domination, or cultural influence. Imperialism often involves exploiting the resources and labor of the colonized territories for the benefit of the imperial power.
to rule and take over other lands
Bismarck was eager to control territories in Lorraine and Luxembourg because they had rich deposits of iron ore, which was essential for industrial development and military power in the 19th century. Control over these territories would strengthen Germany's economy and position in Europe.
Presidios were military forts established by the Spanish in North America to protect their territories and control native populations. They were important for maintaining control over trade routes, securing borders, and providing defense against attacks. The presidios also served as centers for colonization and spreading Spanish culture and influence.
Because they were rich with iron ore.