it provided no means of enforcing the "no war" agreement
It didn't prevent war; it only punished countries that started wars.
Iraq was not itself a signatory to the Kellogg-Briand Pact, but was a British Mandate and is therefore party to the Kellogg-Briand Pact through the British signature. However, the Kellogg-Briand Pact is seen as useless as a legal defense against the use of warfare.
Intel Celeron (not Celluron) isn't per se considered useless. It is a quality processor, though there are (generally speaking) better processors available.
It has to produce something, otherwise it is an useless machine.
ski boots, because they are useless with the skis
In response to NATO, The Soviet Union eventually went on to form what was known as the Warsaw Pact. This was an agreement within Soviet Countries that if someone were to attack one of them within the Pact, it would be considered an attack on ALL of them.
Men MIGHT have gotten paid IF they were in the army. Women, no, they were considered useless.
Nazi Germany (Tripartite Pact signer) Fascist Italy (Tripartite Pact signer) Slovakia (Tripartite Pact signer) Romania (Tripartite Pact signer) Hungary (Tripartite Pact signer) Yugoslavia (Tripartite Pact signer) Bulgaria (Tripartite Pact signer) Transylvania (Tripartite Pact signer) Croatia (Tripartite Pact signer)
Blanking is the act of a user deleting a good answer, and replacing it with false/useless information.
Useless
the Atlantic Pact is a pact between most of the Atlantic countries against communism
The Warsaw Pact.