Because the Hindu-Arabic numeral system contained a zero symbol which made mathematical calculations a lot simpler than the Roman numeral system which didn't have a zero symbol.
its because
Arabic-Indic would be: ٥٠٠ Eastern Arabic-indic would be: ۵۰۰ Note: assumes most-significant digit to the left.
Arabic numerals are called that because the European interpretation of those numbers comes from the Arabs. The numerals are called Arabic numerals (even though they do not resemble modern Arabic numerals in the slightest) to distinguish them from Roman numerals.
The Roman numerals lvi or LVI converted into Arabic numerals are 56
The Roman numerals LXVII=67 in Hindu Arabic numerals.
In Arabic numerals, it is 616. In Roman numerals, it is DCXVI.
Arabic-Indic would be: ٥٠٠ Eastern Arabic-indic would be: ۵۰۰ Note: assumes most-significant digit to the left.
Arabic numerals are called that because the European interpretation of those numbers comes from the Arabs. The numerals are called Arabic numerals (even though they do not resemble modern Arabic numerals in the slightest) to distinguish them from Roman numerals.
30 in Arabic numerals is ٣٠
Arabic numerals, which are much more practical than the Roman system.
The Roman numerals lvi or LVI converted into Arabic numerals are 56
The Roman numerals LXVII=67 in Hindu Arabic numerals.
In Arabic numerals, it is 616. In Roman numerals, it is DCXVI.
44 IS Arabic Numerals.
192 is already in Arabic numerals
The Roman numerals of XXVIII are the equivalent of 28 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
dcccxiii in Roman numerals is equivalent to 813 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
Hindu Arabic numerals are the ones we use. 39 is already in Hindu-Arabic numerals.