Want this question answered?
De-arm, accept the peace treaty (blame and guilt), pay reparations and give away certain lands to the 'winners'.
The winners were USA, Japan, and the colonies The losers were Germany, Hungary, Bulgaria, Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the Ottoman Empire
The answer to this question is stated by war correspondent Dick Ennis (played by actor Robert Mitchum), in the 1968 film release, "Anzio." He will give the answer towards the end of the film, after re-boarding a naval ship, and enters the bridge.
Is any weapon illegal in war? Not if someone can rationalize its use in the given conditions and it helps them win such that they can't be tried in a court convened by the winners as war criminals for using it. History is almost always written by the ones who won the war to make them look good and the losers bad. According to the Geneva Convention, which existed before World War I, the uses of chemical and biological weapons were deemed illegal. Therefore, mustard gas, nerve gas, and any other type of similar chemical weapon was illegal. (This did not restrict their use, however, as both sides used notoriously high quantities of these.)
Yes, there are winners in wars. The way I think about, there are no winners to wars because war is basically just the killing of another human being for the possession of oil, land, or wealth. I find war to be stupid, but technically there are winners to wars.
the Peloponnesian war was bad for the losers because the Athenians which were the losers, lost their homeland and it was also bad for the winners because the winners were all the city-states and after the war they won a lot people lost their jobs and their home. It was also bad for the winners because the Spartans and the other city-states lost a lot of men afetr the war.
the Peloponnesian war was bad for the losers because the Athenians which were the losers, lost their homeland and it was also bad for the winners because the winners were all the city-states and after the war they won a lot people lost their jobs and their home. It was also bad for the winners because the Spartans and the other city-states lost a lot of men afetr the war.
the Peloponnesian war was bad for the losers because the Athenians which were the losers, lost their homeland and it was also bad for the winners because the winners were all the city-states and after the war they won a lot people lost their jobs and their home. It was also bad for the winners because the Spartans and the other city-states lost a lot of men afetr the war.
There are only losers in a war and no winners.
In a Tug of War game
It was bad for the winners of the war because they often faced economic strain from the cost of the conflict, had to deal with the aftermath of destruction, and had to navigate the political consequences of their victory. For the losers, they faced occupation, reparations, loss of territory, and social upheaval, as well as having to rebuild their nation after the devastation of the war.
The people that made the weapons on both sides and those that were in a position to take advantage of war reparations that were made by Germany while it lasted.
Tug O WarThis is because the winners go backward and the losers go forward into a puddle of mud (at least how I play)
De-arm, accept the peace treaty (blame and guilt), pay reparations and give away certain lands to the 'winners'.
In any war of consequence, its a certainty that the leaders of the warring nations will blame the evil leaders of the opposing nation for causing the war. This applies to both the winners, losers or a situation where there is a general armistice.
The winners were the Allies, consisting mainly of England, America and Russia, along with France, Canada, and some others. The losers were the Axis, consisting mainly of Germany and Japan, as well as Italy and some others.
The winners were USA, Japan, and the colonies The losers were Germany, Hungary, Bulgaria, Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the Ottoman Empire