Want this question answered?
Three? Quite a series of countries, more then three, are so stable that any ranking of them are totally arbitrary. These include the Nordic countries, the Netherlands, Luexemburg, Switzerland, Canada... Changes in the political leadership in these mature democracies have very subtle fallouts, hard for any distant observer to notice at all. It is more about managing and perfecting, then pursuing visions.
the government during the 1970s was at rock bottom. the democracy was not stable. As percentage of independent countries, democracies reached their lowest point, weighing in at only 30%.
They expected improved trade, protection, and a stable economy
The strongest reason against independence was that the colonists would have to work very hard a creating a stable country. All aspects of how to fund the country, defend the country, and get recognition seemed all but impossible. The strongest reasoning for independence was that the country could gain their freedom and enjoy more of the amenities they were already working so hard to obtain.
that it has a stable government
When Communism came into fashion in the 20th Century it became populare among many of the peasants in these lands because they saw the only way out from under their oppressive masters was revolution.
yes, true
A major obstacle in building stable democracies is lack of trust in political institutions, which can result in low voter turnout, political apathy, and a loss of confidence in the government's ability to address citizens' needs. Additionally, corruption, political polarization, and weak institutional frameworks can also hinder the establishment of stable democracies.
Three? Quite a series of countries, more then three, are so stable that any ranking of them are totally arbitrary. These include the Nordic countries, the Netherlands, Luexemburg, Switzerland, Canada... Changes in the political leadership in these mature democracies have very subtle fallouts, hard for any distant observer to notice at all. It is more about managing and perfecting, then pursuing visions.
In the World War II era, the United States promised the Philippines nation its independence for a variety of reasons. Perhaps the most important was its fundamental commitment to the development of other nations as self-respecting sovereigns. While the American record is not unblemished in this regard, its treatment of the Philippines is consistent with its interest in assisting other nations with taking steps towards becoming stable democracies in their own right.
because Europeans changed the whole government style of ruling
Many factors contribute to the lack of political maturity in African countries, including corruption, economic mismanagement, tyranny, political intolerance and lack of solid institutions.
----the parties can continue to make compromises over a long period of time(novanet)----
the government during the 1970s was at rock bottom. the democracy was not stable. As percentage of independent countries, democracies reached their lowest point, weighing in at only 30%.
Cuba gained almost immediate Independence. The Filipino's fought on, insisting that they also had a right to Instant Independence. They were however a fragmented society without a stable leadership and constant infighting. It became the Philippine American War. They were granted Independence after WW2. Guam and Puerto Rico accepted their status and remain US Territories.
Democratic Peace Theory: No two liberal democracies have ever gone to war, so the presence of democracies in the Middle East should help to temper conflicts.Internal Stability: Democracies tend to be more stable and free than dictatorships, allowing problems to be ameliorated without massive riots.Cooperation: The USA has an easier time forming alliances with democracies because it is a similar political system to the USA.
I think it is stable.