answersLogoWhite

0

The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto.

The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why were roman consuls awarded the power the veto?

The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.


Why was the roman consuls awarded the power of the veto?

The Roman republic was created after ousting the Etruscan king, Tarquinius Superbus (Teraquin the proud). The Roman senate wanted to ensure no such dictator could reign in Rome again. The senate gave itself the power to veto outlandish laws, like "everyone must give Maximus all their money or else they will die". Its also just the democratic thing to do.


What were the powers of a roman consul?

power of veto


Why was the power to veto in the Roman empire significant?

Because the power to veto would make so the Emperor did not have supreme power


Why were Romans consuls awarded the power of the veto?

The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.


Which government of roman was given the veto power?

consul


Who currently has a line-item veto power?

In the United States, currently no one has line-item veto power. It was awarded to the president in 1996, but was later deemed unconstitutional in 1998.


Which branch of Roman government was given veto power?

consul


How did veto balance power in the roman government?

They would have consul it


What is roman council?

Each council had the power to veto one another.


This branch of the Roman government was given veto power?

All the Magistrates had the power of veto, they could veto the actions of all magistrates underneath them, but the Tribunes of the Plebs could veto all magistrates, including Consuls.


How was the power of Romans consuls limited?

The power of the Roman consuls was limited by the veto of the tribunes, or in later times, by the emperor.