Both the North and the South had resources that the other did not. The North had all of the factories, money, and industry, but the South had all of the farmland.
The South was dependent on the North and other outside resources. It was more decentralized and was not as developed as the North, which could sustain itself.
Many southerners in the mid-1800s viewed the North with suspicion and resentment. They saw the North as economically and politically dominant, and believed that its growing industrial power threatened the traditional agrarian way of life in the South. Southerners also resented what they perceived as interference by the North in their institution of slavery.
yes
The economy of the South was dependent upon slave labor.
The north and the south fought against each other in the civil war.
The north has a larger population
The South was dependent on the North and other outside resources. It was more decentralized and was not as developed as the North, which could sustain itself.
no they are not because in 1800s the south fought with the north over slavery
slavery and diferent ideas
first of all you are wrong, the life in the south was harder by transportation than the north was. In the 1800s in the south there was over 10,000 miles of railroad track's north had a better transportation way in everything, more railroads, roads, and canal's, the north was filled exceptionally with canal's. The south only had a few good and easy ways of transportation.
Harriet Tubman was an escaped slave who went back South to help other slaves to escape.
north has more railroads than south
The South's economy was based almost entirely on agriculture
In the 1800s, the north and the south of the United States were segregated from each other due to public dislikes, which eventually led to the Civil War.
The South had fewer large cities than the north.
the north during the 1800s was more advanced, had more factories and railroads. the south wanted slavery and was dependent on slaves and cotton Actually the south wasn't dependant on slaves, only about 5-7% even had slaves in the south, and that same percent were even rich enough to have them, the rest had small farms that didn't make much money. The north indeed had slaves, but they were immigrants from Europe i.e. Irish, poor English etc... the north was overall richer than the south and they had factories and other businesses where the south rarely had any, the south did have African-Americans doing labor, but were paid a small amount a day, the rich folks had actual slaves.
the mid 1800s the north was so upset and the south was upset and tthey felt veery sorry and they did not like it and It is very diagreement ande very crazy thing. they disagree about there was so much growth in the north and most of all slavery.