Very few large plantations that needed a large number of workers.
no they werent because the north and a south had a gentlemans agreement that if the south used their slaves the fight would be unfair and the south would win
slaves werent supposed to be literate during slavery so they only became literate when they escape from the south
Yes there were slaves in the New England States, but they weren't as popular as they were in the south because they were less profitable in the North because of winter accommodations and thing of that sort.
Slaves were not taken to New England and there was no slavery in New England. The largest slave market was in Charleston South Carolina.
new England is manufacturing and the south is farming (king cotton)
In New England, slaves worked primarily as household servants, artisans, and in maritime industries. In the Middle colonies, slaves worked on farms, mines, and in skilled trades such as carpentry and blacksmithing. In the Southern colonies, slaves worked on plantations in agriculture, primarily in tobacco, rice, and indigo production.
They did NOT have slavery. Only the south did.
Slaves would fight for England. Not sure that I see the relevance, please explain. Was England significantly involved in the American Civil War, which, I assume, is what we are discussing?
the slaves in the south were freed by the Emancipation Proclamation.
They were not treated equally. For example there was a white school and a black school.one, they werent slaves then and two, they were separated from the whites.
To have an aristocratic society like that in England
The slave economy was more leaning on the South rather than the Middle and the New England Colonies.