No idea i'm stuck as well.
Harald Hardrada was a good candidate for king because he was already the king of Norway he was also a relative of a last king, he was also an experienced leader.
No
king harald hardrada
Harald Hardradas, was the youngest brother of King Olaf, and the third in line for the throne ,
because his ancestor was king in 1016 to 1035
Harald Hardrada was born in Poland but moved to Spain for 1 year when he was 21 , but soon moved to Wales and then fighted to be king in 1066.
Harald Hardrada was a Viking king who conquered lots of other countries. That was his favorite thing to do as it is with any king--take land and become powerful and rich. He was killed in the battle of Stamford Bridge by Harold Godwinson in the fight for the English succession when Edward the Confessor died.
Harald Hardrada was the King of Norway, so yes he was Norwegian
Yes he was. Harald Hadrada was married to daughter of king Yarovslana, Elizabeth and his second wife, Tori Torbergstatter.
Because he didn't like the fact that his brother (Harold Godwineson) was king.
Harald Hardrada would have been a good king because he was French and he could speak different languages so people would like him, and he was very prepared for a war he was even a experienced warrior.Harold Godwinson had sworn on the saints bones that he will be king.
Harald claimed that he had a right to the English throne. He was related to King Canute, the King of England from 1016-1032. Harald said this gave him every right to invade England.