They would do that in order to reserve the right to re file the suit at a later date. If they did not dismiss it and it went to the judge to decide and they lost due to lack of evidence they would not be able to sue you again. But if they withdraw the suit they can refile when they can prove their case.
the dismissal of thirty civil servants for dishonesty and misconduct.
A voluntary lien would be a mortgage.A voluntary lien would be a mortgage.A voluntary lien would be a mortgage.A voluntary lien would be a mortgage.
If you are referring to a dismissal from a job, I do not think that should be there. I have never heard of the dismissal from employment being on a bankruptcy. I would consult an attorney on this.
To answer the question, the circumstances stated in the dismissal letter or what type of response you would make to a dismissal letter must be known.
Since it is voluntary, it would seem to indicate that the prosecutor requested that the court dismiss the charge, subject to its being re-institued at some later time, rather than by the prosecutor simply Nolle Prossing it.It is an order issued by a judge dismissing the charges that were brought in the case - usually for some legal insufficiency, or lack of evidence, of the case itself.There are two types of dismissal:Dismissal WITH Prejudice, and Dismissal WITHOUT Prejudice.WITHOUT Prejudice means that the charges MAY be re-instituted and brought before court again.In addition: In civil cases a party may take or request and get a voluntary dismissal of a claim (whether a plaintiff's complaint or a defendant's counterclaim, etc) if, for example, that party is not capable of proceeding with his/her case at that particular time. The claim may be reinstated or refiled at a later date, provided the statute of limitations governing that claim has not expired.
you can do voluntary community sevice
If such things were voluntary we would not exist.
They had a voluntary exchange on the apartment.
The party who brings the case may dismiss the case at anytime, generally, and sometimes with stipulations, agreements. That would generally be considered a voluntary dismissal, i.e. dismissal for their own reasons, likely. On the other hand the opposing party may ask the court, by motion, too dismiss the case brought against them; and the court may grant that motion to dismiss, and dismiss the case. The involuntary dismissal may occur because, for example, a party fails to comply with rule requirement or requirements in his/her "pleadings."
If the statute of limitations has not passed, you would be able to refile. However, almost all civil lawsuits are going to be past the limit at 18 years.
Yes, an order for dismissal does not wipe out the record. For that you would need to petition the court to have the record expunged. ALSO: A LOT depends on WHAT KIND of dismissal you received. Dismissal WITHOUT prejudice means the same charge can be re-instituted against you again. Dismissal WITH prejudice means that that same charge can't be brought against you again for that particular offense.
The word voluntary can mean doing or giving something out of free will. An example of a sentence using the word voluntary would be, many charities are run on voluntary time and donations.