Want this question answered?
That would be up to the hospital board, and, I would think, what the misdemeanor was.
if someone is denied rights and privileges would it be exclusionism ethnocentrisn, predjudice or discrimination?
No. When simply referring to a podiatrist, there is no need to capitalise it. It would be capitalised if it was part of a title on a sign, such as "T.M.Smith, Podiatrist".
If you are in the states then no. The only thing that prevents you from hospital privileges is lack of money. It is a pay-or-die health plan in the USA. If you have coverage you are in good shape but without it you can only depend on the Emergency Room and waiting about 12 hours for care.
A Podiatrist is a foot doctor. People who are having problems with ligaments and bones in their feet would go to one.
a podiatrist (foot doctor).
That would be a "podiatrist".
Podiatrist
The mother is not relevant, but if the nurses believe that there is a medical reason then visitation may ne denied. I would suggest you contact the administration for the hospital.
Podiatrists are associated with the care of feet and ankles. If one had foot paint or discomfort, then seeing a podiatrist would be a logical first step towards relief.
Yes and Indian medical doctor would be allowed to work in Korea. They would have to get the required work permits and be given practicing privileges at the hospital or doctors office.
A possible example of the suffix "-phagist" would be "necrophagist," which refers to an organism that feeds on dead or decaying matter.