A state or country can maximise the prosperity of its citizens when it produces those products and tradable services for which it has a comparative advantage. In other words, it is better to concentrate on growing or making what you can grow or make better than others, sell these products internationally and buy products that other states or countries can grow or make more efficiently. It has been shown that the protectionist alternative, where a state or nation tries to be self-sufficient, results in a lower standard of living.
The Spartans did not grow crops. The serf population (helots) were obliged to deliver half their produce to the Spartan state, which distributed it to the Spartan citizens.
they would produce corn
they would produce corn
It would produce more crops or food.
Some main crops would be lettuce or carrots. Produce is the main heart of product activity. 2/4 of the produce grown in America is grown in California.
The land is usually good to grow crops on. It is rich in minerals and with care it can produce abundant crops.
Rich soil would improve crops. More crops = more produce that can be sold and more produce that the area does not need to import. I had history homkework on it and got a 100%
lower egypt
you could bring crops to grow and they will give off oxygen
In history: Farmers would probably have paid their taxes in produce - crops, animals, etc.
That would be based on the laws of intestacy. They vary from state to state and country to country.
we grew O'G KUSH , Ever 3 months we would chop them down an SMOKE UP!