so that they would get punished for a crime
It was a long hard job to wash anything, but their body would have been clean. They went to the baths daily and scraped dirt off. The baths were an important part of the life of all Romans.
A dirty question.
it is a toga
toga
A toga!
The toga was a symbol of Roman citizenship. Under-age boys and slaves would wear tunics, and women would wear the stola.
Men-Tunic:normal roman men would wear a plain tunic(would have purple stripe if they were a senator),toga:normal men would wear plain toga(toga virilis)and the senators would have a purple edging(toga praetexta).Women-Simple sleeveless white tunic, a stola:a long flounced dress, girdled at the waist and reaching the ankles which would go over the tunic. For outdoor wear they would wear a palla: a single piece of material like the toga & draped around the body in the same way.Boy-Toga Praetexta would be worn until sixteenth birthday,with a tunic underneath.Girl-The girl would be dressed the same as their motherBoth children wore a bulla which was a good luck charm. Girls would give theirs up when they got married and when the boys became sixteen, they gave it with the first scrapings of their beard to the household gods.Women used parasols to shield them from the sun and men used broad brimmed hats called the petasus for this purpose
who could wear a toga most would ask? well the people who can wear a toga are the mencitizens of Rome. they are the only ones.
who could wear a toga most would ask? well the people who can wear a toga are the mencitizens of Rome. they are the only ones.
Toga! Toga! Toga!
In Roman culture only the very wealthy were allowed to wear togas. A toga required the use of one hand when walking. This meant that the person wearing the toga could not do manual labor.
Nothing was displayed on a wealthy man's toga to show his rank. A guys' wealth was determined by the amount of slaves and clients that followed him around. However if he were a senator, he had a purple stripe on his toga which showed his status. Some sources say that the sons of noble families could also wear the purple stripe, but it is unclear if it was the child's toga or the adult's toga.Nothing was displayed on a wealthy man's toga to show his rank. A guys' wealth was determined by the amount of slaves and clients that followed him around. However if he were a senator, he had a purple stripe on his toga which showed his status. Some sources say that the sons of noble families could also wear the purple stripe, but it is unclear if it was the child's toga or the adult's toga.Nothing was displayed on a wealthy man's toga to show his rank. A guys' wealth was determined by the amount of slaves and clients that followed him around. However if he were a senator, he had a purple stripe on his toga which showed his status. Some sources say that the sons of noble families could also wear the purple stripe, but it is unclear if it was the child's toga or the adult's toga.Nothing was displayed on a wealthy man's toga to show his rank. A guys' wealth was determined by the amount of slaves and clients that followed him around. However if he were a senator, he had a purple stripe on his toga which showed his status. Some sources say that the sons of noble families could also wear the purple stripe, but it is unclear if it was the child's toga or the adult's toga.Nothing was displayed on a wealthy man's toga to show his rank. A guys' wealth was determined by the amount of slaves and clients that followed him around. However if he were a senator, he had a purple stripe on his toga which showed his status. Some sources say that the sons of noble families could also wear the purple stripe, but it is unclear if it was the child's toga or the adult's toga.Nothing was displayed on a wealthy man's toga to show his rank. A guys' wealth was determined by the amount of slaves and clients that followed him around. However if he were a senator, he had a purple stripe on his toga which showed his status. Some sources say that the sons of noble families could also wear the purple stripe, but it is unclear if it was the child's toga or the adult's toga.Nothing was displayed on a wealthy man's toga to show his rank. A guys' wealth was determined by the amount of slaves and clients that followed him around. However if he were a senator, he had a purple stripe on his toga which showed his status. Some sources say that the sons of noble families could also wear the purple stripe, but it is unclear if it was the child's toga or the adult's toga.Nothing was displayed on a wealthy man's toga to show his rank. A guys' wealth was determined by the amount of slaves and clients that followed him around. However if he were a senator, he had a purple stripe on his toga which showed his status. Some sources say that the sons of noble families could also wear the purple stripe, but it is unclear if it was the child's toga or the adult's toga.Nothing was displayed on a wealthy man's toga to show his rank. A guys' wealth was determined by the amount of slaves and clients that followed him around. However if he were a senator, he had a purple stripe on his toga which showed his status. Some sources say that the sons of noble families could also wear the purple stripe, but it is unclear if it was the child's toga or the adult's toga.
white
They didn't have proper school so no. If you wanted your children educated you would hire them a tutor, sometimes more than one.
yes people in toga where togas
Hercules would have worn a Greek style toga.
yes
it is a toga
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.