Want this question answered?
Since extrusive rocks are formed by lava (not magma), the rocks can be found easier because they are on the surface, whereas intrusive rocks are formed underground so they are either harder to get to or they are found in smaller quantities.
It is easier to correlate diagrams because all units are scaled down, making it easier to see the "whole picture". In the field, the geologists have to deal with huge tracts of land, which makes it difficult to reconstruct a sequence of events.
In outcrops and cliffs it is possible to see multiple layers of rock exposed in one place, which makes it easier to study a set of rocks.
The time of day. The list is endless. It would be far easier to answer the opposite question. It IS affected by mineralogy, cooling time and a little by pressure.
it would be easier on a topographic map because it is easier to read
Since extrusive rocks are formed by lava (not magma), the rocks can be found easier because they are on the surface, whereas intrusive rocks are formed underground so they are either harder to get to or they are found in smaller quantities.
It's not necessarily easier to study extrusive versus intrusive rocks, simply because it depends on the exposure. In places like Hawaii, Iceland, Chile, and Yellowstone, where you have a great deal of geologically recent volcanism, it is very easy to study recent lava flows, and so in these places, it is easy to study extrusive igneous rocks. However, there are many places on the planet where granite, a classic example of an intrusive igneous rock, is exposed at the surface, so there is little difficulty in studying the intrusive igneous rocks at these locations.
No, but it's easier to see if you reverse the logic of the question. Intrusive rocks are igneous by definition, and these are all blends of crystalline minerals.
Intrusive rocks come into other rocks in a molten state and when they cool they are frequently very hard with interlocking cemented crystal structures. When erosion occurs it is easier for wind, ice and rain to wear down the rocks into which the igneous rocks were intruded than the hard igneous rocks themselves. This leaves the igneous rocks sticking up (like King Arther's Seat in Edinburgh or the Tours of Dartmoore) as prominent features.
I don' t know
I don' t know
It is easier to correlate diagrams because all units are scaled down, making it easier to see the "whole picture". In the field, the geologists have to deal with huge tracts of land, which makes it difficult to reconstruct a sequence of events.
In outcrops and cliffs it is possible to see multiple layers of rock exposed in one place, which makes it easier to study a set of rocks.
You would normally think that an igneous rock would be harder to break. However, it completely depends on which igneous rock is being compared to which sedimentary rock, as their resistance to breakage is so varied. There are some igneous rocks (obsidian and pumice, for example) that would break much easier than some sedimentary rocks, such as chert or flint.
Because when they form, minerals in igneous rocks often contain only a parent isotope and none of the daughter isotope. This makes the isotope percentage more accurate and easier to interpret.
Geologists would be interested in outcrops and/or cliffs because sometimes cliffs show the different beds of rock under the Earth's surface. This is easier than drilling into the ground and getting a sample of the rocks.
The time of day. The list is endless. It would be far easier to answer the opposite question. It IS affected by mineralogy, cooling time and a little by pressure.