Oxygen is not used in light bulbs because it is too reactive and would catch fire.
If you are talking about a light bulb that would be Thomas Edison. If you are asking about a flower bulb...I don't know. sorry
I think that the orange and nails light up the light bulb because the acid energy goes through the nails and into the wires connected to the light bulb and powers the light bulb
Yes
The energy used by a lightbulb in kWh can be calculated from the voltage across the bulb, the current through the bulb, and the number of hours of operation of the bulb. energy = voltage * current * hours / 1000
When one bulb burned out, a small section of light goes out.
It is too reactive
Because the oxygen does not have a full outer shell of electrons, meaning that it is a reactive gas and therefore it would easily catch fire.
no
The current flowing through the filament causes it to heat to a very high temperature - so high that is becomes incandescent (glows) and gives light. If the bulb was filled with oxygen then, at those high temperatures, the filament would oxidise - burn out - and the bulb would be "blown".
because oxygen is not an inert gas
Possible oxidation of the metallic filament with traces of oxygen existing in the light bulb.
Then there would be no light bulb. We would have to watch TV by candle light.
The filament in the light bulb is heated to a very high temperature. At such a temperature oxygen from the air would oxidise the metal(s) in the filament and thereby destroy the bulb. Using an inert gas such as argon in the bulb prevents such oxidation.
No. Light bulb filaments become extremely hot when in use, and oxygen, which is highly reactive, would cause the filament to burn away in a matter of seconds. Argon is used because it is inert, and thus will not react with the filament.
everybody would use the light bulb
The filament (assuming an incandescent bulb) would burn up very quickly.
I would suspect the bulb is burnt out.I would suspect the bulb is burnt out.