simple. they want money
to get a new breed
It would be immoral not to.
Yes with selective breeding. This is when humans breed different animals to create a new breed.
There are no animals on the Antarctic continent, except the sea birds and sea mammals that visit its beaches to breed. People live and work, temporarily on the continent, and tourists visit Antarctica today.
Animals, including birds do not breed with animals of another species. A canary would not breed with a parrot. So if you had many kinds of birds in a bird house they probably wouldn't not interbreed.
Test your wool for micron diameter and breed the finer micron animals together or source a ram with a finer micron.
People test on animals because if they tested on humans then we would be killing our own population, so if you breed small vermins such as mice and rats they are bread especially for testing on so it is ok. I my self am against animal testing. People test on animals because if they tested on humans then we would be killing our own population, so if you breed small vermins such as mice and rats they are bread especially for testing on so it is ok. I my self am against animal testing. To help the human population progress in health, to find cures, technically to save lives.
No dog breed is good for busy people. A cat or bird would be a better choice.
to hold animals as harvest and then they would breed them kill them and use them for there bakery
All animals have the instinct to breed. If they hadn't have, the species would have died out long ago.
people breed hamsters so there can be more of its kind like if it where rare they would want there to be more of those cute fuzzy hamsters
There are certain places which breed these animals for that purpose. There is, example, a place for pandas, where the male is put near the female when it is time to mate and the female then gives birth. It is a small process but realy worth it. We should thank god that people would give time for these animals.